style="margin-top:40px; BROADSIDES

October 09, 2006

Axis Of Evil Goes Nuclear
North Korea, a charter member of the Axis of Evil, went nuclear last night when it detonated a nuclear bomb in an undergound test.

Judging from world reaction, diplomats are shocked that over ten years worth of diplomatic appeasement, wish-wash warnings and wrist-slapping sanctions didn't deter Kim Jong Il from developing a nuclear arsenal. And just this morning, President Bush provided a fine example of the hollow diplomatic blather which serves only to encourage Kim and his ilk:

Last night the government of North Korea proclaimed to the world that it had conducted a nuclear test. We're working to confirm North Korea's claim. Nonetheless, such a claim itself constitutes a threat to international peace and security. The United States condemns this provocative act. Once again North Korea has defied the will of the international community, and the international community will respond.

This was confirmed this morning in conversations I had with leaders of China, and South Korea, Russia, and Japan. We reaffirmed our commitment to a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula, and all of us agreed that the proclaimed actions taken by North Korea are unacceptable and deserve an immediate response by the United Nations Security Council.

The North Korean regime remains one of the world's leading proliferator of missile technology, including transfers to Iran and Syria. The transfer of nuclear weapons or material by North Korea to states or non-state entities would be considered a grave threat to the United States, and we would hold North Korea fully accountable of the consequences of such action.

The United States remains committed to diplomacy, and we will continue to protect ourselves and our interests. I reaffirmed to our allies in the region, including South Korea and Japan, that the United States will meet the full range of our deterrent and security commitments.

Threats will not lead to a brighter future for the North Korean people, nor weaken the resolve of the United States and our allies to achieve the de-nuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. Today's claim by North Korea serves only to raise tensions, while depriving the North Korean people of the increased prosperity and better relations with the world offered by the implementation of the joint statement of the six-party talks. The oppressed and impoverished people of North Korea deserve that brighter future.

Let's look at a few of the president's statements:

Once again North Korea has defied the will of the international community, and the international community will respond.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, we've heard this before. Sounds just like our diplomatic condemenations of North Korea's long range missile test last July. The key phrase here is "Once again..." That's an inadvertent admission by the president that past diplomatic threats against North Korea are ineffective. And yet, he goes on to make another diplomatic threat: "the international community will respond." It's a safe bet that the international response will be nothing more than a UN resolution concluding that North Korea did a bad thing.

We reaffirmed our commitment to a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula ... Um, too late, Mr. President. The time to commit to a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula was before Kim pushed the button on his nuke last night. (Besides, a policy goal isn't achieved solely by announcing your commitment to it.) And if the United States is committed to a nuke-free Korean Peninsula, why, after Kim refused to abandoned his nuclear weapons program, did you continue to honor an awful agreement Clinton made in 1994 to build two light-water nuclear power plants for North Korea which ultimately yielded weapons-grade plutonium?

The United States remains committed to diplomacy ... Translation: Nothing will be done to stop Kim from developing more nukes. Why? Because diplomats never act preemptively; their job is to react after the fact, once the damage is done. A case in point is North Korea's nuclear bomb test last night.

The transfer of nuclear weapons or material by North Korea to states or non-state entities would be considered a grave threat to the United States ... In this, the president is absolutely correct. North Korea's economy generates no hard currency for the regime, so it must acquire wealth by selling arms aboard. There's no doubt that Iran, Syria and the terrorists those countries employ will be first in line to buy Kim's nukes, and that they will use those arms against the United States and our allies.

A decade of diplomacy has failed to stop Kim Jong Il from acquiring nuclear weapons; so what makes President Bush believe that diplomacy will stop him from developing more nukes and selling them to our enemies?

If there's a U.S. foreign policy matter which cries out for military preemption as a solution, it's this one. An American premptive military action (a naval blockade or airstrikes) will help prevent North Korea from becoming a terrorist's convenience store for nuclear weapons. Many lives could be lost in such a military undertaking, but millions more will die of incineration and radiation if diplomacy remains America's preferred weapon against North Korea.

My greatest fear is that if the president continues to use only diplomacy in dealing with North Korea, then we'll sometime soon wake to the news that a major American or European city is in ashes. And we'll hear the president announce that "Once again North Korea has defied the will of the international community ..."

  • B. Sides @ 11:20 AM
  • Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11


    SFC Paul R. Smith MoH Tribute
    CPL Jason L. Dunham MoH Tribute
    LT Michael P. Murphy MoH Tribute
    MA2 Michael Monsoor MoH Tribute
    MSG Woodrow W. Keeble MoH Tribute
    PFC Ross McGinnis MoH Tribute
    Coalition to Salute America's Heroes
    Statues of Servicemen Fund
    VFW Military Assistance Program
    Fisher House
    Wounded Warrior Project
    Freedom Alliance Scholarship Fund
    Intrepid Fallen Heroes Fund
    Adopt A Platoon
    Marines-Law Enforcement Foundation
    Special Ops Warrior Foundation
    America's Heroes of Freedom
    Adopt A Sniper
    Operation USO Care Package
    Operation Military Pride
    Books For Soldiers
    Freedom's Angels
    Vets For Freedom
    Gathering of Eagles
    Faces of the Fallen

    James Lileks
    Leaning Towards The Dark Side
    Michael Yon
    Taco's SandGram
    Ranger Up
    One Marine's View
    Michelle Malkin
    Bob Parks
    Jackie Mason
    Ron Silver
    Sgt. Stryker
    Tim Blair
    Jeff Jarvis
    Internet Haganah
    Little Green Footballs
    Rightwing Sparkle
    Power Line
    Virginia Postrel
    Kyle Smith

    Tech Central Station
    Drudge Report
    World Tribune
    Free Republic
    Global Security
    Society for Internet Research
    Terrorism Knowledge Base

    G. Gordon Liddy
    Bill Cunningham
    Quinn & Rose
    Laura Ingraham
    Mark Levin
    Rush Limbaugh
    Dennis Miller

    New York Post
    Washington Times
    Opinion Journal
    Washington Post
    The American Spectator
    London Telegraph
    Financial Times
    Times of London
    Jane's Defense

    Milton Friedman
    Thomas Sowell
    Claudia Rosett
    Victor Davis Hanson
    Mark Levin
    Larry Elder
    Mark Steyn
    Pete du Pont
    Charles Krauthammer
    Walter Williams
    David Horowitz
    Ann Coulter
    R. Emmett Tyrrell
    Michael Ledeen
    Larry Kudlow

    Reagan Presidential Library
    Landmark Legal Foundation
    Hoover Institution
    Protest Warrior
    Cato Institute
    National Center for Policy Analysis
    National Taxpayers Union
    American Enterprise Institute
    Americans Against Hate
    National Rifle Association
    National Right to Work Committee
    Reason Foundation

    Declaration of Independence
    The Constitution
    The President
    U.S. Judiciary
    Department of Defense
    U.S. Central Command
    National Archives
    Library of Congress
    CIA World Factbook

    Institute of Official Cheer
    The Simpsons
    Callahan Online
    Tucker Max
    The Onion
    Day by Day
    The New York Times

    June 2002
    July 2002
    August 2002
    September 2002
    October 2002
    November 2002
    December 2002
    January 2003
    February 2003
    March 2003
    April 2003
    May 2003
    June 2003
    July 2003
    August 2003
    September 2003
    October 2003
    November 2003
    December 2003
    January 2004
    February 2004
    March 2004
    April 2004
    May 2004
    June 2004
    July 2004
    August 2004
    September 2004
    October 2004
    November 2004
    December 2004
    January 2005
    February 2005
    March 2005
    April 2005
    May 2005
    June 2005
    July 2005
    August 2005
    September 2005
    October 2005
    November 2005
    December 2005
    January 2006
    February 2006
    March 2006
    May 2006
    June 2006
    July 2006
    September 2006
    October 2006
    November 2006
    December 2006
    January 2007
    February 2007
    March 2007
    April 2007
    May 2007
    June 2007
    July 2007
    September 2007
    October 2007
    November 2007
    December 2007
    January 2008
    February 2008
    May 2008
    June 2008
    July 2008
    September 2008
    November 2008
    December 2008

    design by maystar
    template via blogskins
    powered by blogger

    Powered by Blogger