Editors Of The Columbus Dispatch 'May' Be Racist
Last week,
Drudge exposed the Democrat/Kerry race-baiting strategy for the campaign's home-stretch. Their "mobilization" manual urges party and campaign operatives to have "minorities" allege voter intimidation -- even if none exists. "If no signs of intimidation techniques have emerged yet," the manual directs, "launch a 'pre-emptive strike.'"
You'd think that, once exposed, the DNC and the Kerry campaign would back away or even denounce such a desperate tactic.
Not so.
Amazingly, Kerry campaign spokesman Tad Devine went on CNN to defend the Dems' plan to deliberately make false accusations of GOP racial intimdation. Devine carped, "What happened in 2000 will never happen again. We're going to make sure that people vote. We're going to make sure people of color are not turned away from voting places." (I'm still waiting for just one example of a voter "of color" -- or any other color -- who was "turned away" from voting in Florida or elsewhere in 2000.)
Has the Kerry campaign's admission that its home-stretch strategy is based on perpetuating a racist hoax discouraged Kerry operatives-masked-as-objective-journalists?
Of course not.
The lefty editors at the
Columbus Dispatch are gleefully part of the hoax. Here's today's front-page headline:
Punch cards may hurt blacks
Must be a bitch to edit a newspaper while wearing a white hood.
Isn't it interesting that punch card ballots weren't controversial in the 1992 and 1996 presidential elections? Only in 2000 -- when a Republican won -- and in 2004 -- when a Republican is about to win again -- are these punch cards, according to leftists, suddenly difficult to tally and damaging and confusing to an entire race of people.
The Civil War ended in 1865 and yet today the party of slavery, its presidential candidate and its accomplices in the press continue to treat voters who have a darker skin hue as if they are property of the Democratic Party.
